June 2023

The Ashkenazi Jews & The Khazarian Empire

After the Romans burned the Second Temple and destroyed Jerusalem in 70 AD, thousands of the surviving Jewish inhabitants fled Judaea and settled in other areas throughout the Mediterranean and elsewhere. Over the passage of time a significant number of Jews established themselves in Germany, primarily in the area known as the Rhineland. During the Medieval period the Jews living in Germany identified themselves as Ashkenazim. The German Jews adopted the title of Ashkenaz for a couple of reasons: one, to distinguish themselves from other Jewish communities, such as the Sephardic Jews of Spain, and to signify the geographical location in which they built a civilization. For the name Ashkenaz is found in the Bible, where in Genesis 10:3 Ashkenaz is listed as the grandson of Japheth, one of the three sons of Noah. Now traditionally speaking it is believed that the descendants of Japheth went on to settle within the territories of Europe, after God came down and confused the languages at Babel. And this European location (namely the Rhineland) was discerned by the Jews as the land of Ashkenaz. Additionally, though the Jews claim descent from Shem (Noah’s second son) these Semitic peoples took upon themselves a non-Semitic title in order to cement their identity as European Jewry.

Even-though what has been presented thus far regarding the origins of the Ashkenazi Jews may stem from a more mainstream account, there has also come down to us a quite popular theory which associates the Ahkenazi Jews with a Turkic tribe which originated from Central Asia, who in turn converted to Judaism in the 8th century of the common era. And these Turkish converts to Judaism are identified as the Khazars. The Khazars were a semi-nomadic people who eventually developed into an empire, beginning in the 6th century until they were defeated by the Kievan Rus in the 10th century, and soon afterwards seem to mysteriously disappear from history. At its epoch the Khazarian Empire encompassed the territories between the Black and Caspian Seas, and stretched from the Caucus Mountains to the south, all the way up to the Volga River in the north. Before their conversion to Judaism around the year 740 AD, the Khazars practiced a form of shamanism much like the other Turkic tribes of Central Asia. Now there has come down to us a splendid story, or legend rather, which tells the tale of how the Khazars became a Jewish nation. For during the reign of the Khazarian king Bulan, the religions of Christianity and Islam were the dominant faiths in the region. Wanting to adopt a more organized religion for his people, the Kagan or king of the Khazars heard the religious arguments of a Christian Priest, a Muslim Imam, and a Jewish Rabbi. The Khazar Kagan ultimately chose Judaism over Christianity and Islam, due to Judaism being the root religion of the two other faiths. Thus in the mid-8th century AD did the Turkish Khazars become Jews by mass conversion.

Returning to the Ashkenazim, it has been recorded that tens of thousands of Ashkenazi Jews migrated out of the Rhineland in the beginning of the 15th century and then settled in parts of Eastern Europe, such as Poland and Lithuania for example. But even before this Ashkenazi migration into Eastern Europe, there had been Jewish settlements in Ukraine going all the way back to the 7th century. It has also been argued that the Jewish presence in Eastern Europe and the various areas of Western Russia did not come from Ashkenazi Jews migrating from Germany, but rather this Jewish element derived its genesis from the Turkish Khazars, who’s empire was once directly located in-between the geographical setting of Eastern Europe and Russia, where Jewish communities had later been established. So instead of Ashkenazi Jews migrating out of Germany, making up the Jewish populations of Eastern Europe and Russia, the Jews in these territories could have actually been the remnants of the Khazars. This hypothesis could also explain why the Khazars disappeared from the historical record after they were conquered by the Rus in the 10th century. If this theory is correct, then the majority of the European and Russian Jews are not Ashkenazim, but rather Khazarian.

Now it is of no surprise that the bulk of modern day Ashkenazi Jews disagree with this Jewish/Khazarian claim, which in turn has sparked debate among Jewish intellectuals, who do indeed provide strong arguments in the support of their genuine Jewish origins and at the same time debunk the belief which teachers that Ashkenazi Jews are in fact racially Turkish, and therefore a non-Semitic people. One such argument against the Jewish/Khazar link states that, because there are no linguistic similarities between the Jewish dialect of Yiddish in comparison to the various Turkish languages, then there can be no Turkic origins in relation to the German or European Jews. Another argument in support of the Jewishness of the Ashkenazim has to do with cultural elements. For the cuisine, music, and literature of the Ashkenazi Jews are completely bereft of any Turkish elements. Additionally, the Jewish theory of how they settled in Germany relates that the Jews originally migrated from the Middle East via Italy into Germany and not through Khazaria.

In conclusion, the theory of the Ashkenazi Jews descending from the Turkish Khazars is indeed very controversial, and also extremely insulting towards the Jewish people as a whole. It has not been my attempt to usurp the racial and religious integrity of the Ashkenazi Jews, but rather it has been the job of this historian to unbiasedly present an alternative version of history which challenges the mainstream narrative. Whether this story is true or false, the intent here has been to raise awareness of a belief held by many, which is also being taught in the field of what is known as revisionist history. That being said I will leave it up to the individual to either accept, reject, or better yet inspire one to do their own research into this subject and come to their own conclusions. For as it is said, “the truth is out there!”

 

References:

HaLevi, Y. The Kuzari: In Defense of the Despised Faith. (Spring Valley, NY: Feldheim Publishers, 2013).

Koestler, A. The Thirteenth Tribe. (New York, NY: Random House, 1976).

O Muslim, Did Jesus Indeed Say, “I Am God Worship Me”?

The following presentation is a response and a rebuttal to the Muslim argument which preaches that Jesus never said, “I am God worship Me.”

In recent days Muslims all across the globe have suddenly presented an argument that they say proves that Jesus was not God in the flesh, and that argument is stated as follows: Where in the Bible did Jesus say, “I am God worship Me?” Islamic scholars have even gone so far as to say that if someone can show them where in the Gospel Jesus said “I am God worship Me,” that they will get baptized immediately! Now even though Jesus may not have uttered the exact words which Muslims have argued He never said, this doesn’t mean that Jesus never claimed to be divine or that He did not desire or allow others to worship Him. This work will attempt to defend the divinity of Jesus Christ as expressed in the Bible and reveal how Jesus was in fact worshiped all throughout the Gospels.

For a man to stand up before a crowd and make the statement, “I am God worship Me” would most certainly guarantee this person to be either insane, narcissistic, or both. So for God to incarnate as man, He would most likely need to be a little more gracious in order for people to take Him seriously. God the Father is humble and Jesus Christ as the Son of God is also humble. Christ never forced people to worship Him nor did He force others to believe in Him, but rather left it up to the individual to either believe in Him or to reject Him. Jesus never made an arrogant statement about Himself, but His actions and His miracles were enough evidence to reveal Jesus’ divinity without Him having to make a roaring declaration in order to prove that He was God nor to demand that all should worship Him as God. There were times however, when Jesus was left with no other choice than to confess that He was in fact the Son of God, such as He did during His trial before the Sanhedrin for example (Mark 14:61-62). Though Christ made no statement that believers should worship Him, Jesus did not hinder His followers when they did worship Him. That being said, let us now take a deeper look into the Gospels where we find that Jesus was indeed worshiped as Lord and as God.

In the opening verses of the second chapter of the Gospel according to St. Matthew, we witness men worshiping Jesus Christ even when He was just a newborn baby. For it is written, “Now when Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judaea in the days of Herod the king, behold, there came wise men from the east to Jerusalem, Saying, Where is he that is born King of the Jews? for we have seen his star in the east, and are come to worship him” (Matthew 2:1-2). So even before Jesus was born men of understanding traveled afar in order to worship Him as the King of the Jews: The Messiah. Additionally, the Magi were not the only Gentiles who worshiped Christ, for a Canaanite woman worshiped Jesus when pleading with Him to heal her daughter who was vexed with a devil (Matthew 15:25). Among His fellow Jews, Jesus identified Himself as the Son of God to a blind man that He gave sight to. Once the former blind man believed in Jesus as the Son of God the Gospel says that he worshiped Jesus (John 9:35-38). Going further, after His resurrection Jesus met His disciples, “saying, All hail. And they came and held him by the feet, and worshiped him” (Matthew 28:9). So here we see that even though Jesus did not tell people plainly to worship Him as God, the individuals who recognized Him as the Christ took it upon themselves to give Him the honor and praise that was His just due, and in turn Jesus accepted their worship and did not admonish them for worshiping Him.

Now when someone begins to study any sacred text, it is severely inappropriate for mortal men to approach God, God’s Word, or one of God’s holy prophets and demand a word from them that would generate a belief system based on one’s own terms and on one’s own limited human understanding. For a Muslim to say I won’t become a Christian unless I see in the Bible where Jesus says I am God worship Me, would be like a Christian saying I won’t become a Muslim unless I read in the Qur’an where Mohammad says I came to save the world and to give my life as a ransom for many. So for a person who adheres to one religion to go and compare their faith to the faith of another religion, then there will of course be differences of beliefs and opinions found in that foreign faith. But to project a differing personal viewpoint towards another religion without thoroughly studying that faith, only gives birth to a weak argument that is based on a desperate attempt to foil the teachings found in that separate religion.

When studying the Gospel, the description of Jesus Christ as the Son of God is clearly expressed and His worship as Lord and God by others is also vividly outlined. For example, after His resurrection Jesus appeared to His disciples and Thomas (who had previously doubted that Christ rose from the dead) upon seeing the wounds in Jesus’ glorified body realized that Jesus was indeed divine and exclaimed unto Him, “My Lord and my God” (John 20:28). Also after Jesus sent His disciples out to preach, they returned and told Jesus that some people were saying that He was Elijah or one of the prophets. But when Jesus asked the disciples who they thought He was, “Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God” (Matthew 16:16). Jesus even referred to Himself as the Son of God in John 10:36, and also spoke of Himself as the Christ in Luke 24:46. But the most telling of all passages found in the Gospel which solidifies the Godhood of Jesus is found in John 8:58, where Jesus tells the Jews that, “Before Abraham was, I AM.” This statement made by Christ reveals that Jesus is indeed the Great I AM, who appeared unto Moses at the burning bush (Exodus 3:14).

In conclusion, after scanning all the verses quoted from the Gospel in this brief work, a clear case has been made for the Christian doctrine which holds that Jesus is in fact the Son of God and that He is worshiped and accepts worship. The argument which expresses that Jesus never said “I am God worship Me,” is an attempt to twist the sayings of Jesus found in the Gospel and to brazenly put words in God’s mouth instead of reading the Gospel honestly and accepting the teachings of Who Jesus truly is according to what has been outlined in the holy scriptures. Jesus is the Word of God, the second person of the Holy Trinity which is one in essence and undivided. Before His incarnation, Christ Jesus was always in the very bosom of God the Father from eternity past. For as it is written in John 1:1, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” And in the book of Revelation Jesus refers to Himself as the “Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending…the Almighty” (Revelation 1:8). So from the very mouth of Jesus it is revealed that He is Almighty God and is worshiped according to His divinity as one of the Holy Trinity, Who is glorified together with the Father and the Holy Spirit. Amen.